9th October 2011, 08:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 204
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Elk
Vortech (and others thinking of using the S&R Jockey Rating),
I gave Albury a go today and quickly found an anomoly:
|
One that bothers me more if you watch out for it , is that occasionally the jockey and trainer ratings can be the complete opposite of what the neural values are saying. This I find hard to comprehend.
Maybe it is a warning that you cannot rely on a single data source?
__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"
|