Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aussielongboat
I tried that also and they came up similar to the over all result - i.e. a loss of around 20% loss on turnover
can you run through what you have - because - hey - maybe my data is incorrect.
|
I don't know what's happening but I can't even get near enough to the results you guys were getting.
Let's make the rules crystal clear;
First I selected all the races where there were more than 11 runners
after scratching.
Then selected Don Sct top rated. meaning I selected the
lowest "DIV" thinking that it's the "top rated"
If this horse was also tab number 1 then I looked if it finished first at its last start and if it did then I looked if it had at least 11 carrier starts.
Complied with all of this, then I looked at the results to see if it won or placed.
For this year I only had 81 qualifiers for 16 winners and 37 for the place (1-2-3).
Win loss -29.9 place loss -18.4
The only way I could get the qualifying numbers close to what you guys got, if I selected ALL the horses with Tab number 1, regardless where it was in the ranking, all other rules complied with of course.
It is disturbing in serious way, I don't mind being wrong but if we can't get these results within a ballpark of each other then what and who's research-results can we trust?
Cheers