Thread: Ratings
View Single Post
  #32  
Old 9th December 2011, 07:13 PM
aussielongboat aussielongboat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
I don't know what's happening but I can't even get near enough to the results you guys were getting.

Let's make the rules crystal clear;

First I selected all the races where there were more than 11 runners
after scratching.

Then selected Don Sct top rated. meaning I selected the lowest "DIV" thinking that it's the "top rated"

If this horse was also tab number 1 then I looked if it finished first at its last start and if it did then I looked if it had at least 11 carrier starts.

Complied with all of this, then I looked at the results to see if it won or placed.

For this year I only had 81 qualifiers for 16 winners and 37 for the place (1-2-3).

Win loss -29.9 place loss -18.4


The only way I could get the qualifying numbers close to what you guys got, if I selected ALL the horses with Tab number 1, regardless where it was in the ranking, all other rules complied with of course.

It is disturbing in serious way, I don't mind being wrong but if we can't get these results within a ballpark of each other then what and who's research-results can we trust?

Cheers

yeah your results are similar to mine

that's why i was surprised when the other post was talking about these glorious returns.

it seemed too simple and too good to be true.

and hey
guess what..
you know the rest
Reply With Quote