View Single Post
  #1  
Old 5th April 2004, 08:22 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Default

Hi, Alblyn and Peakester.

The reason why Launceston R5 no.10 was not included in my selections was because my newspaper, the Sunday Telegraph, did not provide a pre-post market for the Launceston races, nor for Gawler or Bunbury. I did not check Unitab for these meetings. I assume it was a 5 pointer - it met all the other rules of the system. What a pity - it paid $3.60 and $1.60 which is a very good dividend for the system. I won't claim it as a system winner because I can't be certain the Telegraph would have had it in the top three faves, and also, I did not list it as a selection on this forum. But it is heartening to know that the system continues to perform.
Reply With Quote