Hi guys. I've been thinking about things a bit and i have to agree. To be realistic I reckon that betting on the short priced horses when the bank owing is low would be okay,because the chances of the $50 would be pretty good. If say I have allocated $1000 bank for each number, then if the bank owing reaches say $500, then a limit should be put into place as a security. Maybe something like 4to1, until the saddlecloth salutes. You can also factor in how well the other two numbers are supporting the system. When I have been testing this system, I have made a healthy bank, so far its like $4500 in profit on paper. The run of outs I checked over where I have had a sequence of 19,23,24 consecutive losses, the odds of the horses I bet on were not that short either,probably 4 in the sequence. I know all of these systems that you can come up with you could do with an endless bank but having looked over a lot of race results I can see one thing. With the spread of the winners,it appears that 1 to 7 win about 75% of races. Saddlecloth numbers 1 to 3 appear to win at least 40% of races. I've been noting down sydney results too and they are very similar. To really convince myself and probably you guys too is to dig up the old tables of winning saddlecloths for the season that were in the newspaper. about the last 10 years should do the trick. These tables used to have the longest losing sequence as well. In here lies the secret
I dont think its good to bet all over the paplace. The system is being based on melbourne races or sydney races say and to have a separate bank with sydney would be the only way to go really.