View Single Post
  #9  
Old 26th April 2004, 11:05 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default


Geezzz, take a joke Bagman [ If I misread your response, the joke is on me :smile: ]!

Been off line with an OS crash and doing THREE fresh XP installs [if anybody has a ata/raid h/drive, DON'T press F6 when asked, PRESS F5 and select ACPI interface and save yourself OS problems after the install !!!].


One problem for the price you want as I see it Bagman is the higher the price the lower the SR within the 45% SR of the top 2. [ in other words the shorter the price the higher the SR and vis-a-vis that evens out to 45% SR for all runners regardless of price [within top 2].

Put another way, you will loose [not win] the same amout of money backing all the $3.20 only runners as you will all the $1.80 only runners.

Value [or lack of it] could be at either end of the top 2 price range, but the only way to decide what was genuine value was after the runner had won.

To pin-point those winning value [there ain't no value in loosers regardless of price] runners, takes good old fashioned reasoning and personal choice based on the stats. at hand and how good you are at arriving at your final decision as to what the genuine value runner was.

All the stats. in the world by themselves will lead you to only 30% winners. Any improvment on that comes from the punter I think.

Cheers.


[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2004-04-27 06:34 ]
Reply With Quote