The thing that makes ratings different is the points you allocate for each rating factor this is why if you looked at 5 different people that produce ratings you will see they often have different runners in different orders with different prices.

This is because they use a different method to apply ratings to the current information.

the same can be said for people that study form they have there own ideas on what form factors are more important to them, for example, nothing i do with form has anything to do with pace or time yet there are other people that may only use these 2 factors as the main selection criteria.

Do they select more winners than me? well i guess we would have to compare results and run tests.

in today's tech world there is not that much that has not been explored to find winners and what info one person has more than likely another person can obtain just as easy.

It is the way you apply the info that matters and ratings are just another way to apply them.

__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out." --moeee
_______________________________________________