Barny.

Thanks for the post. However it creates some problems for myself when one is trying to broaden ones knowledge and mind bank.

I am starting to sound like a " Yes " man, by agreeing with the poster regardless of what view is taken.

By this I mean that when I came on here I also was looking for the angle that others overlooked. I have never been a favourite's man, although if they are the stand out then i will back them, but in most races I like to go a little wide and look for horses with the form but not todays following.

With my system I feel comfortable operating in the $4 to $12 bracket. I do not deliberately go looking for that bracket price but that is what normally comes up.

However, and with due respects to some others they believe you should not venture to far from the pointy end. They have much more experience then I have in this type of betting, so I have to defer to them.

So, he is the conundrum. You all know that I like value because I have started some threads about it and other relative subjects. And yet others are saying forget the big odds stick to the pointy end.

Now, he is a maybe solution which I have asked previously under various topics.

From an experienced System person is it possible and indeed wise to have one system mining for mid range winners and another that concentates on the Shorties.

Many on here have quite a few systems, do you see a compromise between the two.

Star