Quote:
|
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
No response to the first question Barny which is a pity but I,m sure there will be more testers out there.
"Urban Myth Busters" though is a great thread and I,m sure most of us would be interested in what comes out of it.
Q2.In this day and age of Training methods do the Fillies and Mares perform worse than the Male horses?
Cheers and thanks for a enlightening thread.
darky
|
Darky
You know those weighed 56kg+ win more races than lower weighed horses
You also know Geldings are the most consistent beasts to bet on.
Or I have let the cat out of the bag
What else have I got in my armory:
1. Also those that have not won at the distance are a better betting edge than those that have...DS rating @ R&S
2. and forget those that have won at the Track...divvy killer. (DS rating @ R&S)
3. Barriers are a myth, except those >11, not so good IMHO
4. Apprentices are not worth going near even with Mooeee''s money
5. 4 and 5 yo's are more reliable than the Melbourne Metro Trains....
6. Queensland tracks (non-Metro) and Wa & NSW Metro tracks in neural ratings aren't worth the bandwidth in down loading them
7. Don Scott R&S ratings are best applied to those that have less than 4 wins
8. Days Last run don't make a fig of difference to the top DS rater in R&S ratings
....these are all my experiences...so they are not right or wrong, but may help