2nd August 2012, 02:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
|
|
It was a bad decision by the CEO.
He saw a turnover increase as an increase in share value, must have had shares and must have had a clause somewhere in his contract.
Every other business commentator said it was the nail in the coffin, including the CEO of TattsGroup who slammed them for such business practices.
|