15th September 2012, 05:22 PM
|
|
Suspended
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Barny
It has 111 selections over 13 years which is nowhere near enough for most to even contemplate backing it
|
This is the part that doesn't make sense to me.
Explain to me , how does it make any difference , whether it took 13 years or whether it took 13 weeks?
You seem to be suggesting Barny , that 111 selections over 13 years is far and away more impressive than 111 selections over 13 weeks.
If I went to the casino 111 times in 13 years and won a Total of $600.
Or if I went 111 times in one year , that's twice a week . and won a Total of $600.
Is one or the other more impressive? |