Interesting post, barny

A quick look at today's major meetings using your approach...

Randwick
R5 NIL selections
R6 NIL
R7 NIL
R8 NIL

Flemington
R6 NIL selections
R7 NIL
R8 NIL
R9 NIL

I found it an interesting contribution in that you...
(1) put fwd the basis of a winning system
(2) then highlighted a "miserable" POT
(3) aluded to some potential via "the right filters"
(4) and posted the stats i.e. a large number of selections and few winners
(5) then you rejected your own system because it's "too close to the bone"

Are you able to explain:
a. how this is the basis of a winning system ?
b. why you have put fwd an argument that both confirms and denies the underlying premise, several times ??


Cheers LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB