6th October 2012, 09:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lord Greystoke
I see how it all makes sense to you and justifies how you see both sides.
What I don't get is...
1. how this post is helpful to someone else who might read it
2. how someone else could improve on this approach?
LG
|
In answer to your Questions 1. With a couple of additional filters they might improve on it, and you might note LG that one of the filters is an unpopular > 28 days (freshened up) 2 . Do some research and find a few filters that are in sync with the base filters.
BTW, my additional filters give this an 85.1% POT on few selections, which doesn't suit most as they're sceptical about future performance of a system that is based on substantailly less than 1,000 selections (for instance). |