6th October 2012, 09:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Barny
BTW, my additional filters give this an 85.1% POT on few selections, which doesn't suit most as they're sceptical about future performance of a system that is based on substantailly less than 1,000 selections (for instance).
|
Once again - I see how this is helpful to you. Not to anyone else, however - especially if most of us are sceptical about this kind of approach, as you say. Will also be of limited value unless we are able to see what you see regards the additional filters, or at least a hint in the right direction with a little more detail so that one can then do some meaningful research.
Cheers LG
PS Didn't you say that there over 3,000 selections in your stats? Or were you referring to the low number of winners??
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
|