Like I said I've been looking at tipsters results in AFL 2003.
Getting a bit fed up with it,but am noticing that people like Mike Sheahan and Jon Anderson done much better profit wise than ex-players,Lyon,Wallace,Hird,Healy.
Both done better than me even.
But when I average these two tipsters margins together,I get an overall loss again.
This I don't understand.
A tipster with a winning profit joins forces with another tipster with a winning profit equals a losing profit.
Does that mean you can know too much for your own good?

Cheers Mo.