11th February 2013, 07:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,051
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by michaelg
According to my records I began applying the T,D, & C (The Schmile) filters on Friday 8 Feb, but up to that time there was an overall total of 34 accidents for 16 of The Schmile accidents which is a worry.
The filter has been existent for the past three days. During this period there's been 72 selections for 70 smiles for a loss of $86. However, one of the accidents wasn't from a genuine selection. If I had identified this, then the method over the three days would be in profit of $247.
As there is doubt about the efficiency of the filter I now hope to look at the three days from Friday 8 to yesterday and see how the deleted (T, D and C) selections would have fared. When known, I will detail the result here.
|
Hi Michaelg,
I think it might be best to take Vortech's thinking in introducing the top 4 tatts filter where it reduced 50% of accidents for only a 13% reduction in selections.
My question is that the T,C,D filters, while being 16 of the 34 accidents may actually make money laying overall due to being overbet?
__________________
The Schmile
"I buy when other people are selling.”
― J. Paul Getty
|