3rd March 2013, 07:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinconpaul
The reasoning behind identifying no's of consecutive losses/wins is because they are the arch enemy of recovery staking plans. Most plans if staked right can handle two or three consecutive losses but any more and then followed shortly after by another loss and you've just been "shaken out of the tree". I was considering setting up multiple instances, using the same selection system, whereby instead of betting consecutive races each instance is programed to randomly miss a race or two or three in unison with each other so there's no double ups. Hopefully this will break up any clusters of losses. I'm not a mathematician and maybe this will have no affect?
Thanks in advance,
RP
|
As far as I know, Benjamin Franklin wasn't a scientist either. Interesting insights RP.. thanks for your contribution to date.
Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
|