View Single Post
  #10  
Old 26th May 2013, 04:47 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Try Try Again
Only allowed one edit so of course I inadvertently hit send.

Proper results are:-

Elimination Year By Year

2006...12 bets....9 wins..100.0%S/R...Win bank +16.7 units...POT% 139.2%
2007...26 bets....9 wins....34.6%S/R...Win Bank +2.5 units...POT% 9.6%
2008...32 bets...15 wins...46.9%S/R...Win Bank +19.35 units...POT% 60.5%
2009...31 bets...13 wins...41.9%S/R...Win Bank +12.0 units...POT% 38.7%
2010...22 bets...11 wins...50.0%S/R...Win Bank +14.35 units..POT% 65.2%
2011...28 bets...15 wins...53.6%S/R...Win Bank +19.6 units...POT% 70.0%
2012...26 bets...10 wins...38.5%S/R...Win Bank +4.6 units....POT% 17.7%
2013....9 bets.....3 wins...33.3%S/R...Win Bank +0.6 units....POT% 6.7%

I certainly would not bet all contenders but do bet qualifiers after my elimination rules. It is a tidy system which has given nearly 7 years of profit, albeit some years have just squeezed out a profit. It is certainly a system to have in your portfolio. What will happen to 2013 - who knows?


These look like good figures.

2006 SR looks a bit wrong though ... lol .... 12 bets 9 winners 100% strike rate ?

Its definitely a worthy addition to a portfolio of systems. I have found a lot of systems on this site that still turn a profit. Its actually quite good to go back a few years and retest the systems which have stats produced. You can see if the system has tanked or continued on since posting.
Reply With Quote