6th July 2004, 04:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 107
|
|
Quote:
On 2004-07-04 11:28, Chrome Prince wrote:
Hi Paddy,
Well Perth certainly looked ordinary on the scoreboard didn't it?
No, I didn't actually as the database just spits out the contenders. The one thing is that overall the selections show a 10% POT in Perth even if slow or heavy. So it wouldn't have altered the selections.
|
If this system runs through the wet season wouldn't it be better to factor-in for track condition somehow Chrome Prince? and inrease the profit.
|