
13th September 2013, 06:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 40
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
Surely trapping the males and setting up a fenced area to control numbers is a more humane and effective longterm control. A fenced area could be less than 1% of a National Park and still be massive in size so as to not restrict freedom of movement and still supply enough food.
It costs $40 a head to kill 1,000 brumbies.
I think there are better ways of killing them for $40,000 than aerial shooting.
I don't know, it's all just inhumane and completely illogical to me.
|
That would be too easy for another human outside the authorities to do, however imbercilic beauracrats get paid to complicate and come up with illogical decisions.
Best TJ
|