
27th July 2004, 08:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle nsw
Posts: 436
|
|
Try putting all of the options on zero.Then place the $$ option on 5.Look in any reliable source at the prizemoney earned.Compare the results with those that the neurals throw up.Whether its "total" or "average" prizemoney the true results are frequently entirely different from the neural offering.
Conclusion is,,either the neurals are hopelessly out of date,,or,,there are a lot of programming errors in there.
Having performed that simple,and easily checked test,you have to wonder about the rest of the program.
I often get the #1 selection up to a 100 points ahead of the #2 selection.Yet it will open at 33/1 in the market and never be a viable bet.
Having said that,at Warnambool yesterday the top three selections in every race produced 5 winners and 2 second places.Yet last Saturday for 24 races at three meetings it managed to scrape up three winners.
I dunno..............
|