21st January 2015, 06:20 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkermac
Assuming that the thing I read on the internet regarding the Discounted Harville method was correct, and that I didn't stuff up my implementation for 12 runners from the example that was given with 7 runners, a "fair" price for the winning trifecta (given the win odds for the field - and using the presumption that the odds are a somewhat accurate representation of the true probabilities) would be $72,844.14.
As a general rule, I suppose you should avoid betting all combinations that are of greater value than the pool size. (Though that's quite a lax rule as it's likely you would share the pool with other winning bettors).
...just for interest's sake, the fair trifecta price for the three shortest runners would have been $34.37.
|
You ought to know Walkermac (Excel 2014 Cup winner)
I was using the Don Scott method lol. Harville must've come after him? No matter what the odds, a freaky outcome, hey?
|