8th October 2004, 11:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
|
|
Hi, Sportznut.
No, this "Simple System" is not related to the neurals in any way. It's just that I'm testing the neurals with small fields and it has been performing very well using Maxi Divi. During the testing I notice that the top 3 TAB nos. have also been doing well in races up to 1,200 metres - I have applied the TAB divvies, so Maxi Divi would produce even greater profits.
I have this a.m. looked at several Saturdays metrop races which have produced a loss. But when I remove the top class races of Listed and Group the result is slightly better than break-even, although the strike rate (and profit) is nowhere as high as non-metrop races. I have also noticed that in the results posted at the beginning of this thread that Race 6 and onwards have performed miserably. Maybe R6 and onwards are for better class horses while races 1 to 5 are for a lower class where the topweights have a distinct advantage? or it might be coincidence. There have been 27 of these races (R1 to R5) for 24 winners (not a bad strike rate) - an outlay of 81 for a return of $146; whilst there have been 7 races for R6 and onwards for only 4 winners for a return of $9.
Today's races are:
Goulburn R1 nos. 1, 2, 3
Port Mac R2 nos. 1, 2, 3
Port Mac R6 nos. 1, 2, 3.
|