20th October 2004, 08:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 241
|
|
Hi Syllabus,
Yeh, i get it now, i noticed the bet size stayed static once the run of outs went above six,
Am i correct also that we dont "re calculate" on each step, we just look back at where the "closest" loss figure was, when i was doing my testing sums i found that i was always dividing and ended up with differant figure, i guess it is better to stay with the original bet figures ?
Partypooper,
Im still a little lost with your explination, if i was place betting, do i use the "return" ie 1.75 or the actual profit, ie .75 units to do my calculations, this would make my divisor either 1.5 or 3.5, ???, its got me stuck !
I would be interested to hear from you guys or anyone else who actually use this staking plan, it looks like a little ripper.
I also went back through my recent betting sheets and found two run of outs, one was seven and another was eight, do you think that if betting for place this staking plan would be too slow to recover, or just keep grinding along and use the systems "handbrake" advantage,
best wishes
THE DINGO !
|