Floydboy read my posts again. I was never making an arguement that Vijay was a bad bet. All I was saying is that when you spot what looks to be a great bet based off widely available info, chances are it's not really a good bet at all. In this case it just looks like the bookies were too lazy to post an accurate line.

Mr Ed, a punter IS a gambler. Punter = gambler who bets on sports.

Also "when you keep seeing the one name on top of the leaderboard it is hard to ignore."

That's the sort of thing I'm talking about. Plenty of people could tell you who's in great form, it's widely available information. You won't usually get profitable bets from widely available info.