data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
6th January 2005, 10:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 723
|
|
dingoboy,
A few years ago I ran a system on paper for a full year.
The system was the fav had to be 5/2 or better the second fav 7/2 or better, the third fav 9/2 or better and the fourth fav 11/2 or better.
If this scenario came up then the bet would be the same amount on the 3rd 4th and 5th fav.
The bet would be 1% of the bank on each horse.
Starting with a $10,000 bank after 1 year the bank was $500,000.
When the bet got to $500 per horse it stayed at that figure, the theory being that one had to get set and if the bet kept increasing it would be too hard.
In the one year there was many many losing days.
Only 4 losing weeks out of 52, but never a losing month.
This looked like the holy grail, but like most systems was worked out on the results the next day.
The main problem being, was as I said there was many many losing days,
so basically one could not miss one days racing, or in fact one race that complied with the rules, as sure as hell that would be the day when when you got the last 3 losing days back plus a good profit, or the race you missed is when the 10/1 salutes.
I still look at it now and again and it still works, but as I said nearly impossible to implement.
The other thing was that there were many days with no bet.
Cheers
|