
13th January 2005, 07:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
|
|
Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern would've wiped out their bank, that's for sure.........
Anyway, the point of my original thingo was trying to work out what was a reasonable percentage of a bank to bet on a system with a strike rate of 20%. System suggested starting out at 1% of bank, sounds good. Even with a run of outs of 31, as bhagwan suggested was the maximum, the bank wouldn't be gone, and even if all of the nightmares that keep system up at night drinking ;P came true - ie 31 losers, 1 winner, 31 losers, 1 winner, 31 losers (and if I hadn't ABANDONED it by then!) then the bank would STILL not be gone. Inglorious, sure, but enduring!
Cheers.
Duritz.
|