View Single Post
  #20  
Old 1st February 2005, 10:36 PM
Adrian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are right in your mathematics - assuming only a 10% result was achieved.

My experience is that to date it has been substantially better, and the super specials are not the only selection method provided that provide value.

This is my second year with Propunter, and I can assure you that I wouldn't be using the service again this year if I wasn't showing net profits.

About your rationalisation on costs - How many punters would lose $50 per week on average without even a hope of winning ? Just go and have a look at the local TAB ?? So . . . . at $40 per week Propunter is not really that expensive is it ? Even if it was just helping people avoid making those losses.

As Einstein would say it's all about relativity . . . . .

Even just buying a Sportsman and the Best Bets magazine costs $10/week.

I know $1980 may seem a bit of a hit upfront but I guess those serious punters who subscribe to the service are able to rationalise what they are really getting.

Happy punting
Reply With Quote