9th February 2005, 11:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
|
|
Thanks guys that's exactly what I was after.
I could argue against his method somewhat, as he is assessing potential in a lot of areas, and how often does a horse live up to his potential? This has to be factored in as well. I have also just read G.R.'s method and can argue against his second and third up from a spell bias.
I guess it's the information I was after, not the argument
Thanks again, that gives me a starting point to apply my own ideas and bias or non bias.
|