syallbus, not sure whose side you're on there???

Davez, not disagreeing , but for me it's too slim. I've come across heaps of plans that break even over time but wouldn't be game to try and turn the tide with a staking plan. I like to see a level stakes profit (at least 10% POT)
then apply a staking plan, just to cover the pitfalls. What I was saying is that I'd done that but at some stage there would have been a level stakes loss, yet was still in front. I firmly believe this was due to a wide spread. eg.
(a) considering ALL of ones' selections on one day as being ONE bet, i.e. say you have 7 bets for the day and have a return of $10.5 (to a $) then you are at an equivolent of $1.50 or 2-1 "on" for the day. if your returns were $14 then you are at 1-1, if your returns are say only $2 then your return is a negative .2857 for the day.