Ron,

I'm not sure if you were using my pricing method, but I know you recently said that you were having problems with getting accurate prices for your ratings. Well, I've been having similar troubles. I've found that with my new ratings I'm using, my top rated horses are coming up a bit too short. So I've had a bit of a tinker around and come up with a new 'Ratings to prices' table. Feel free to have a go at this:

Top rated horse = 100 points
0.5 kgs behind = 90 points
1.0 kgs behind = 80 points
1.5 kgs behind = 72 points
2.0 kgs behind = 64 points
2.5 kgs behind = 57 points
3.0 kgs behind = 50 points
3.5 kgs behind = 45 points
4.0 kgs behind = 40 points
4.5 kgs behind = 36 points
5.0 kgs behind = 32 points
5.5 kgs behind = 28 points
6.0 kgs behind = 24 points
6.5 kgs behind = 21 points
7.0 kgs behind = 18 points
7.5 kgs behind = 16 points
8.0 kgs behind = 14 points
8.5 kgs behind = 12 points
9.0 kgs behind = 10 points
9.5 kgs behind = 9 points
10+ kgs behind = 8 points
11+ kgs behind = 7 points
12+ kgs behind = 6 points
13+ kgs behind = 5 points
14+ kgs behind = 4 points
16+ kgs behind = 3 points
18+ kgs behind = 2 points
20+ kgs behind = 1 point