
26th April 2005, 08:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
|
|
Yuckman,
I used "generally" for a reason:
http://www.answers.com/generally&r=67
Your attempt at satire has failed because apparently you didn't know the meaning of that word.
I also suspect you also don't have any figures to back your claims over mine.
I've just run this test over my data of ~1.5 million runs.
The ROT is best of SP/TAB Limited using proportional staking.
For races up to 1400m:
RFS ROT
2 - 84.6%
3 - 85.2%
4 - 88.5%
5 - 94.2%
6 - 92.1%
7 - 89.1%
There is a clear bias in favour of 5-7 versus 2-4. Even for these shorter races.
If a young sprinter goes stale after its 1st 2 runs, then any sane trainer will spell them. So they won't have a 4th - 7th run.
|