Proves how silly I am - posted this in the wong forum initially
There have been lots of systems devised in this forum over time. Many forumites have checked through their records and tested them and have come up with %ages. win/loss ratios and what have you. But it seems to me that the tests have been "across the board" - as in thousands of races in all states & venues. My question to members is has anyone tested systems on a per track basis. Something along the lines that a system is (say) based on horses starting from barrier 1, and have a strike rate of 40% or better wins 60% of the time at all tracks - but at Caulfield that percentage climbs to 75%, or on the other hand it is only 20% at Rosehill. I would be interested if anyone has checked these details in depth. It might be that of the many ides put forward here there are some that could pay consistently - but I don't know