1st May 2005, 04:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 578
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Another good one is .
Very similar .
Set a target over 10 bets .If the target is reached before the end of the 10 bets then no more bets in that series of 10.
Recommence at the end of the 10 bets.
If not. set a new target combined with whats remaining of the old target and also add a new divisor to whats remaining of the old divisor.
Continue on your merry way.
The rationale for this one is that winning and losing runs ALWAYS come in clusters.That is a winning run is always followed by a losing run and vice versa.
The idea is to NOT press your luck after a winning run.
Cheers. darky.
|
Darky, while there can be some merit in a target betting plan, particularly if the target is not too high and enough breaks are used to control the stake size, there is very little merit in the second of the staking plans you mentioned.
In fact it sounds very much like a commercial one marketed by MK - you know the one I mean - there has been a discussion on this forum about it and if I remember correctly, someone made comments that it wasn't much good. I concur with that opinion as the very principle defies logic and is a sucker punch law of averages type that is doomed to long term failure. My advice is stick to your target approach. Wish you well with you 'visionary' appraoch.
|