Nanook,

the ranked order part of that table is very interesting and worthwhile studying, and I will certainly be looking out for any of your posts.

The ~6% edge of #3 over #1 seems to confirm my conviction that publicised selections with the highest strike rate represent poor value because they are overbacked.

I'm also heartened to note your earlier statistics indicating that runners in runs 4-9 of a campaign win far more than their fair share, as opposed to 1-3.

For some reason too many people here seem to warm to simplistic dud selections such as TAB#s when for very little effort they could be getting far superior results by instead exploiting these statistically verfied anomalies.