11th May 2005, 04:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,415
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Imagele
It seems the ozeform ratings were basically flawed in that they assumed a base rating of 52kg.
This became obvious when looking at the ridiculously high ratings given to winners of country highweights.
|
Yep Imagele,
Those ratings could not possibly have been the real deal that Mark actually uses, but just some basic base (can you say that?).
I found many areas where they were flawed, it's only when one starts to apply the ratings and run them over data, that the flaws become glaringly apparent. |