G'day Benny

I don't reckon that 6 months worth of results give you enough coverage of all the possible track, conditions, patterns and other variables. My results analyses went back 2 years after I found that not enough was covered after only researching 1 years results. With 2 years worth I was able to develop a successful statistical based method of selection that is still going strong 4 years later.

Filtering information is very subjective and modified by individual bias for or against each separate factor. It is probably a matter of looking at all the information you have gathered and determining what you feel are the integral ingredients.

Have a look at "Pareto's Principle" via your search engine and bear that in mind when looking through your stats.

Cheers

Privateer