Hey P57,

I see what you're saying but to be sure - lol.

You back the "underdog" Hewitt as you believe that there is no such thing as a certainty - statistical or otherwise. That is to say that as Hewitt is an excellent player, it is not an absolute certainty that Federer will win as the very short odds would suggest. You do this regardless of form or past records against each other, surface etc. Hewitt at $3.50 offers value, to you the punter, whereby Federer at $1.10 would suggest Hewitt will play with no shoes or a racquet.

Am i getting closer, if so i agree in principle and would like to know, in general terms, how successful this strategy has been for you? I have never considered much less attempted to use such a strategy.

Thanks