data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
10th November 2005, 08:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
|
|
lol a good point.
And of course they weren't both the same, M&P's was far stronger, but as an example it serves the point.
To put it another way:
Horse A runs 2nd in a class 1 at Bendigo, beaten 6 lengths.
Horse B, in a class 1 at Bendigo of exactly the same strength, runs 9th, beaten 6 lengths.
I would argue Horse A's run was better, others would disagree, but now what if this happens:
One metre before the line, in Horse A's race, the horse who was leading by 6 dumps the rider, meaning Horse A wins.....
In Horse B's race, Horse B is still beaten 6 lengths into 9th place.
So, are those two runs still of the same strength?
|