Thread: Unbelievable
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 22nd February 2003, 10:36 PM
collingwood collingwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 83
Default

Hi all.
A lot to think about with the suggested filters. Horse cents your filters in Melb turned a profit whereas a 'filterless' approach showed a small loss for the day in Melb but a small profit in Sydney.
Lazyboy did not have time to apply your filters prior to the races and left my Sportsman at the races so can't do it retrospectively. Hope you can shed some light on your results.

For the sake of investigation i have analysed todays results by backing 3 qualified horses per race (on average)without taking into account value - so results are a worst case senario.

With no filters and backing top 3 selections per race (scratchings replaced by reserves)came up with the following results today:

M3/ #3 win $4.00
M4/ #1 win $1.50
M5/ #12 win $5.90
M7/ #13 win $10.80

Outlay $27
Collect $22.20
POT -$4.8

S1/ #4 win $11.30
S4/ #6 win $4.20
S6/ #14 win $10.60
S7/ #2 win $1.40
S9/ #5 win $3.60

Outlay $28 (S6/#14 was equal 3rd qualifier)
Collect $31.10
POT $3.10

I personally think there is something there- just need to apply the appropriate filters (are any required??)without missing out on the longer priced winners. Not sure whether rain affected tracks helped the system or not. Will follow tomorrow at Canterbury (have to buy another Sportsman!!!)

Cheers

Reply With Quote