5th December 2005, 08:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 25
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jfc
The strike rate is 16.2%. That is 12.5% better than the 14.4% distant 2nds in the original sample.
|
oh and by the way you originally posted 15.2%. which is it, 15.2% or 16.2%. and that is not 12.5% better. "%" means per 100 you are getting 0.8 winners per hundred better which means 0.8% better. not terribly "significant.".
Thank you. Winston. |