data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
9th December 2005, 06:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
|
|
Winston,
http://www.flatstats.co.uk/articles/impact_values.html
This free article defines and describes Impact Values, as well as providing a history of that methodology which preceded the computer commodity age.
Note that there is no mention of field size in that article.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The artist formerly known as ?????
by your own admission you have little knowledge of Impact Values therefore I respectfully submit you should not be making rash statement like this. Impact Values most certainly DO take into account field size.
knowing very much both impact values and actual versus expected theory i can tell you very much that your figures are more like impact values.
|
You certainly are adamant that Impact Values do take field size into account, and that you are very knowledgeable about them. Unless you can prove that here in the face of the above contradictory material, I doubt that many will concur with your self-assessment.
Also do not misquote me. I have not admitted that I have little knowledge of Impact Value. Just because I just looked them up, does not imply that I gave them inadequate consideration, or that I made a rash statement.
|