|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Would need a sample of say 100+ races of the 3 selections and at least 20+ winning races to be able to put together a spreadsheet and see how/if it works.
If you had the data puntz I could put something together for you in excel and see how it went. We could compare the two methods as well (i.e. dutching the 3 selections or level staking the 3 selections) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
evajb001, I understand the classic dutch/hedge method of the unit allocation amount.
What I am trying to say is, instead of the classic dutch/hedge formula how many units to allocate on a bet it's the RSP's staking formula for unit amounts, but each calculated separately So instead of just doing a RSP on 1 selection, it's 3, as if each would have been one. The way I see the RSP's concept with the diviser, eventually A, B or C will hit a win. At the end of the 1000 races, there would be a grand total of the A,B, and C. I used the wording "dutch" to try to illustrate the concept, but don't mean to actually dutch....maybe the word for this idea has not been invented yet ! Quote:
I don't keep data, just counters of loss/win streaks with the selection method I use. Quote:
Yeah, but there might be surprises in the long run, a steady simmer of never ending soup! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Yes (soup) there has to be at least a break even situation (as far as I can see)
for this to be successful, i.e. I don't take it that it will turn a 10% LOSS into a 5% profit, but I hope to be proved wrong???? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|