Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th November 2001, 06:43 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi, I have just reviewed my betting returns for the spring carnival for the 3 selection processes I use.

Plan A got 1 in 4 winners and gave 22% profit on turnover
Plan B gave similar returns.
Plan C is my long shot picks which statistically have the worse chance of winning. The results are 6 winners from 88 bets but a return of 62% profit on turnover. This plan had a loosing stretch of 32 outs, which if the picks had been posted would of drawn the ire of many a critic.

What has become apparent is that my bank size has to be dramatically increased if my bet size is to increase. A $500 bank can carry a 30 - 40 run of outs at $10 but I would need $5000 bank for $100 bets.

I'm sticking with my hobby bets for a while longer as watching $320 go for no return was hard enough.

good punting Horse Cents
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th November 2001, 08:48 PM
Mr. Logic Mr. Logic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 243
Default

Hello
Here is what you write about your longshots:
"The results are 6 winners from 88 bets but a return of 62% profit on turnover. This plan had a loosing stretch of 32 outs, which if the picks had been posted would of drawn the ire of many a critic."

I agree with you. That is why the term "mug punter" is used.

Mugs expect every selection to win. If it doesn't win they say the selection was no good.

Mugs also have no idea about normal losing runs with decent selections which can return long term profits.

Mugs also work out % profit on turnovers, if they're smart enough, on three or four selections and quote it at you as if it's meant to be meaningful.

Why are there so many mug punters around compared to stockmarket players? My theory is that you need a reasonable amount of money to buy shares. Even a few thousand dollars is considered a ridiculously small purchase of shares. That decreases the chances of people being complete idiots. You know the saying - "Fools and their money are quickly parted."

But these fools will punt with a few dollars on horses and claim to be experts. Imagine phoning your broker and asking him to purchase $5 or so worth of shares for you. You'd be treated as a joke.

Yet these are the sort of punters who expect selections at $10 or more to have a 20% or 30% strike rate. Mugs and fools. They have no idea and will always be losers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655