I don't have databases and so forth, but all these suggestions, trials etc, they come from the old school of punting days, where things were not as quick as they are today.
Today, the computers/internet and the speed of price updates/information; Does the strategy of yester-year work OK today,
given the fact the old school lads would or could not have forseen the technology and speed of price fluctuation on show ?

I have given this ago over the last couple days but today was a big test in some ways.

I dutched 2 units at my prices per race.

Races 77
Winning 34
S/R 44.16%
U/Race 2 bet
A/U 3.11 win
A/Runners 3.38 per race
Some nice overs on a couple
Rated Backed
5. Civil Rights 9.32-- 17
12. Desert General 13-- 26
4. Nevagotavote 5.74-- 29
1. Remagen Bridge 7.57-- 16
8. Tillzale 6.15-- 17
13. Bellevue Avenue 14.96-- 22

__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out." --moeee
_______________________________________________

Can someone help me.
I can't work out two of the abbreviations above.
Can someone give the total outlay return etc,
I get (strike/rate) (aver runners) but what's( U/RACE,)
(AU) can't work those two out,(L.O.L) been a long day I guess.


Cheers.

All good mate, i could have put it better, the first is 2 Units bet each race, all runners are dutched in to this amount so all prices are worked out and the total bet equals 2 units

AU is average units won per race, so my average was 3.11 so i was getting a little over 50% profit on average per winning race, i suppose would have been easier to just workout the outlay and the return.

Outlay 154
Return 183.25
Profit 29.25
POT 18.99%

__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out." --moeee
_______________________________________________