Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #101  
Old 30th October 2011, 07:00 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,410
Smile

No place2win.........pure coincidence.........this was the last thread that I was reading. I had considered stating this on a new thread but was too lazy. I now wish I had. Again, no offence intended to anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 31st October 2011, 11:38 AM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
No place2win.........pure coincidence.........this was the last thread that I was reading. I had considered stating this on a new thread but was too lazy. I now wish I had. Again, no offence intended to anyone.
While I don't agree with you about the systems being useless, the thought occurred to me, with all these "winning-profit turning" sytems around, how come anyone is losing money anymore?

Or am I mistaken and everyone is a winner?
Just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 31st October 2011, 12:16 PM
TWOBETS TWOBETS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 204
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
with all these "winning-profit turning" sytems around, how come anyone is losing money anymore?

Or am I mistaken and everyone is a winner?
Just curious.
Perhaps we should remember that these are backfitted systems and thus not proven to win. They are indicators at best I would have thought.

Only the real time betting can sort the wheat from chaff.
__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 31st October 2011, 12:41 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TWOBETS
Perhaps we should remember that these are backfitted systems and thus not proven to win. They are indicators at best I would have thought.

Only the real time betting can sort the wheat from chaff.
True, they are backfitted but since we do not have access to any "future" data, we have to make do with back fitting.

I have no problem at all with looking at past performance to predict future outcomes, I do it all the time but I draw the line at torturing data to submit and yield preconceived results.

to wit, if one slavishly follows the line of say "last start winner" regardless of the last race class and other parameters pertaining to that race, then that is "backfitting" and most of the time it will fail.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 31st October 2011, 01:18 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,425
Default

I think it's pretty good that people are having a go at systems.
As long as there is accurate data and logic to back it up.
Unfortunately amongst the decent efforts we have "try this" or systems made up with innaccurate data.
There's no hope of it making a profit.

This is not directed at P2W, just an observation on other threads.

The whole exercise is pointless if the data is wrong to start with or it's guess work, or there are two many irrational filters.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 409,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 31st October 2011, 09:02 PM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is it not true that these days Banks are using expect systems with past data variables to issue future loans to consumers. This technology has stopped defaults dramatically. Much of the Australian data is however limited and bought from overseas. If you have enough data, there is no reason why backfiltering won't work. Many will disagree, but hey, opinions are opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 31st October 2011, 10:01 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,425
Default

It is true that banks, insurance companies, advertising agencies, governments, ratings agencies, federal and state police all use data from relatively small sample sizes.

Scientists also use databases as part of their arsenal now.

I have seen many illogical and unfounded conclusions to the data they use.

But the major difference is they use this data to limit risk, rather than base all their profit on thought up filters.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 409,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 31st October 2011, 10:18 PM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Its funny how some folk use the word "Back fitting " as a derogatory word.

If someone put forward a system with a proven failure rate over the last 150 bets , would anyone want to put real money on it.?

I very much doubt it.

Back data is all we can go on to start with, because the future is not available.

One could argue that using rules like "must have run in last 7 days" as back fitting so as to show a profit.

Example
Neural std setting - Top selection
Must have run within 7 days.

These rules show an excellent profit according to the UB system checker.
If you can get it to work now.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 31st October 2011, 10:28 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,425
Default

Bhagwan,

The seven days rule is used by Read and Bartholemew in their ratings.
It's something that improves strike rate and POT, so it's logical.
It's also a well known fact among trainers that some horses do better with less time between runs, especially fully grown older types who otherwise can "train off".
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 409,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 1st November 2011, 10:33 AM
TWOBETS TWOBETS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 204
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhagwan
Its funny how some folk use the word "Back fitting " as a derogatory word.

Not intended to be derogatory by me Bhags. Backfitting is what pays all my bills.

I'm just saying a working system ain't a working system until it's done the real life test.
__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655