|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Where do you get your results from that include settle positions?
I've wanted to include this element in my rating for ages but have never really come up with a solution I was happy with. I derive a "preferred" position from scraping a form guide, but the race results I scrape don't include settle info. Without that, to my mind, I never really seriously pursued it further. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Originally I did my comparison to the results shown on www.racingzone.com.au
Their website went down for a while so I could no longer record their post-race settling positions however I just had a look and seems their website is back up. Pretty easy website to scrape the results from as well. I have no idea regarding the accuracy of settling results etc etc for their website but there you go anyway. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Here is a question for some people to ponder.
I've been testing my new ratings and some staking ideas and was interested in the view of others. If you had the choice of the following what would you go with: Option 1: +79.10 units 48.00% Strike Rate 79.10% POT 11.07 P/MR (Profit / Maximum Return) Option 2: +68.98 units 48.00% Strike Rate 68.98% POT 22.59 P/MR Basically what I'm asking is would you forgo some profit for consistency of returns? The above options are using the same selections however one is staked with 1 unit per bet, the other is staked to use the same amount of units overall but adjusted for odds (i.e. more on lower odds, less on higher odds). Thoughts? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Option 2 IMHO
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
I'd go for consistency so Option 2.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|