Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th July 2002, 06:46 PM
Big Orange Big Orange is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne: The Racing Capital
Posts: 78
Default

In the new Punt To Win article, "Form Analysis and Betting Odds" (5/7 Edition), the author wrote:

"If you are going to win at racing long term you have to be different from everyone else. Be the same and you will get their long term results."

That is solid gold advice, in my opinion.

Often, it can pay to adopt a contrarian philosophy in racing. Just assume that Joe Public is commonly wrong in either his interpretation of form or his application of betting strategy (or both!).

You are not setting yourself against the Tote or the bookies. You are competing against the punting masses who collectively form a betting market. If the betting market was always completely accurate in representing the true chances of each horse, it would be difficult to make any money out of the punt. Fortunately, the markets are askew enough to give us a fighting chance.

So, think of your ANGLE as your edge. It's the difference or the divergance from the popular way that ultimately moves you towards the land of profit.

Just a thought for the day.
__________________
EVERYONE'S A WINNER!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th July 2002, 09:51 PM
Rain Lover Rain Lover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 94
Default

Too true, Big O.
If the collective wisdom of Joe Public is the market favourite, then he's wrong 2 times out of every 3. Which leaves us odds seekers plenty of runners at juicier prices. I personally like those starters with red ink against their names as it multiplies returns on the other runners and it pays to bet against them. If you can take a 4/6 chance out of contention then you can still back every other runner to make an average 2/1, (even while the bookie gets his 25%).
Anybody got any stats. on odds on flops??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th July 2002, 10:53 PM
Placegetter Placegetter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 191
Default

Would it stand to reason that odds on favourites are just as unsuccessful as evens and better favourites and therefore inherit the 70% failure rate?

This is a geuine question as I don't have any stats on the subject. Seemed logical to me. In the long term the success rate of favourites as a whole would have to apply to subsections or sample spaces.

If it doesn't, then I'd say we have an angle!

Placegetter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th July 2002, 11:06 PM
thekey thekey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 105
Default

Odds on Favs win 55.8% of the time

This is for all races.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th July 2002, 12:05 AM
Equine Investor Equine Investor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 740
Default

Which means unless you accept even money or greater you are bound to lose on the face of it.....Unless you can filter it down further.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655