#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Got on South Africa at $6.25. Now going to try to get a reasonable price on Australia and ensure a handy profit. I see the bookies are taking the draw out of the equation a bit these days. Makes it trickier to get a price about Australia.
What a shocking shot from Hayden. ![]() Last edited by Sportz : 16th December 2005 at 12:54 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() good price south africa.... not sure if they can win, but you get the feeling that aussies can lose wickets quickly in middle order
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Geez, they're $8.50 on IAS now!!! ![]() Australia weren't scoring much quicker than this in the one-dayers last week!!! ![]() Anyway, I agree with you about Australia's middle order, but I thought that Ponting looked in very good form early on, so I decided not to wait and I simply took the $1.44 on offer about Australia there and then. They're $1.36 now. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Im sure you are experiencing that sinking feeling sportz !!! surely the aussies are too short though !! IMO market over adjusts to match situation !!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hmmm yeah. I'm normally very patient when it comes to betting on Cricket, but for some reason, I've jumped the gun here and backed Australia way too soon!!!
Oh well, never mind. As long as it's not a draw!!! (surely it won't be a draw) Last edited by Sportz : 16th December 2005 at 04:04 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Okay 6-199 and the price out to $1.60. Now is the time I would normally have backed Australia.
Anyway, Australia's under real pressure now. Let's see how they go. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Spot on there. Some of the shots today were horrible (not just the middle order though). Once again, the Australians looked very complacent. As for Symonds, well surely this MUST be his last test!!! Quite simply, he is a one-day player, not a test player and that's the way it's always going to be. Last edited by Sportz : 16th December 2005 at 08:32 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() First wicket is important, think that the aussies are always short based on history rather than form . might be chance to back against them in future for profits
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dunno what Ponting waited so long to declare. I know he woulda wanted Hodge to get his double, but he seriously reduced our chance to win it.
By making such a large target, we force SA to play defensive which makes wickets harder to come by, and obviously he's relying on our bowlers for the win. If he had declared giving them 400 to chase, SA probally would've gone for it, make wickets easier to come by, and we'd still be relying on the bowlers. Take a bit of a gamble for a much greater chance of winning or take a safe result probally a draw, a win with luck. Shame he chose the latter. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|