Hi All,

I have tried heaps of differant things to turn a small loss on turn over into a profit, i think this one is a ripper.

I start with my selections, be it unitab 100 pointers or the ol winner in 6 selections, what ever, im not cashed up to "buy" ratings nor inteligent enough to do my own. I then determine the selection by fitting it into price band, ie between 2.5 and 15, using a divisor at 5, away we go.

I stop when a winner is reached, no matter the div, so if i get one at 2.5, its a small loss but i clear the current target and start a new target again, as sometimes a winner will be struck at 13 or so which more than compensates for this.

Thanks to those that have supplied the divisor determination level, ie s/r x av div x .08, mine works out at about 5, i check this often to make sure the div return "adds up to this", to each his own.

I did contact the "owners" of this plan a few months ago to see if there were a "off the shelf" programme but not as yet, so i knocked up a rough excel sheet which is sort of ok.

When it is time to bet away from the old computer,(pub) its easy to remeber the "steps", i use units of 20,25,30,35,42,then just add 25% to each bet after that, normally with a decent s/r you dont have to go this far,....but we all know what happens dont we !

I have read many "versions" of this plan, some say reduce the divisor after a win, some say in a bad run of outs increase it, every one has their own twist but i have found by "taking" the return, be it small loss or indeed profit, then one cant really get into trouble.

I have found that the best way to profit from it is to get fixed or t/f odds as there are some plesant surprises sometimes. Otherwise, it is pretty important to weed out the false favs or something that may fall over.

A classic was on saturday, i was using the unitab 100 pointers, there was a runner at 15/1, he was the top rated 100, the next runner was 96 rated but paying 1.8 for the win, it was hard but i took the 100 pointer and it beat "the fav".This is where i have found the plan to work well, as i could have easilly backed that 100 pointer for a place as it was paying 3.5, which would have compensated for a win with this plan.

If betting "up there" ill write down the selections before i go and obviously disregard the wall tab info and the hopeless form guides, i cant remember the last time i bought a paper,....oh yes i do,...when i bought a system last year,...mmmm.

Anyway, hope it helps some one, its seems to be working for me so if anyone else can get something from it good luck.

Cheers Dingo

I think i need a really strong drink cos i am confused

__________________
spareemail71@yahoo.com

Dont be confused Wombathq,
What Dingo is indicating is that he sets a fixed target of say $50 using a fixed divisor of 5/1 , this does not change .
Using say a bank of $1000.
One continues using this divisor ,adding losses to target until a winner pops up .
When one hits a winner regardless of its price , one starts at the $50 target again.

The idea is that future profits should obsorb any small losses due to low divs.

Dingo is indicating , is that the plan does not have to strike 5/1 shots to make it show a profit .

Test it out over some past results.

This 5/1 fixed divisor idea , can also work targeting $3 per race plus losses , using a $1000 bank.
Start again once in profit.

Like all staking plans , one must hit onto some winners at some odds, to make any paln work.

Cheers.

__________________
Cheers.

I just noticed that Dingo was using $100 Target in his example which was not indicated, when showing 25% increases = 5/1 divisor for target $100 , the outlays of 20,25,30,35,42 ect.
This may have been cause for some confusion.

Cheers.

__________________
Cheers.

correct !

thanks for sorting out my lack of explination.

cheers Ding